Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Sample Clauses

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. So thanks for the question. So there's multiple areas of fit here, and let me go back to what we -- the assessment process that we made. Our main goal in identifying where to expand our portfolio was driven by broadening our offering into the markets that we already serve in Engineered Materials, for example. So the fact that the PMMA resin business offers compounded solutions to those same customer end uses, for example, in automotive, building and construction, consumer electronics and medical, is one of the biggest parts of the fit. The other thing, as you pointed out, there's a very similar application know-how to tailor-make the solution and formulate PMMA compounds as there is with our current Engineered Materials portfolio. And that's -- and frankly, that skill is a great differentiator within the Arkema business. And let me also build on this by referencing the slide 12 in our presentation deck, because I think that will give you a flavor for how differentiated this business is and what kind of skills they have in addressing our customer solutions. And I would point to the number of customers that are served by the resin business, which is really mostly compounds, that there's 663 SKUs at customized product solutions that go to almost 484 ship-to locations around the world. And that's 78% of the business' EBITDA contribution. So it's a great fit, great know-how with customer applications and very similar to what we do in Engineered Materials.

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx #18858

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law, Oxford (2015); see X. XXXXXX: The Passing-On Problem in Damages and Restitution under EU Law, Xxxxx Xxxxx (2017); X. XXXXXX; X.

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X Xxxxxx (Feb 12, 2020)

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx is a teacher as defined in Ind. Code 20-18-2-22. In exchange for the Teacher’s services described below, the Corporation and the Teacher agree that:

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Damages Claims for the Infringement of EU Competition Law, passim, esp. 16-31. 80 See X. XXXXXX; X. XXXXXX (eds.): Punitive Damages: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives, Springer, Vienna (2009). 81 Judgement of the Court of Justice, 13 July 2006, C-295/04 to C-298/04, Xxxxxxxx, xxxxx. 92-93. 82 Green Paper - Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (COM/2005/0672 final), p. 7. On the compensatory principle informing the Damages Directive, see X. XXXXXXXX: Causation in Competition Law Damages Actions, pp. 13-16. 83 European Parliament Resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (2006/2207(INI)), para. 17. 84 Article 3.3. 85 Green Paper, pp. 7-8. Although in favor of that the ability of the victim to mitigate the damage and losses may be taken into account, the Parliament noted that the possibility of defendants arguing that all or part of the gains they made as a result of the infringement have been transferred to third parties (the passing-on defense) would be detrimental to establishing the extent of the damage and the causal link. However, the Commission subsequently accepted it in the White Paper, not on the grounds of the principle of effectiveness, but on the grounds of the doctrine against unjust enrichment as well as on the basis of an (alleged) common compensatory principle of European tort law.86 Despite this, the compensatory principle also underlies most national tort systems,87 without the admissibility of the passing-on defence necessarily being recognised as such in these systems before the entry into force of the Directive.88 In fact, it is also not recognised afterwards outside the scope harmonised by it. Generally, on the contrary, the deduction of the benefits obtained from the amount of compensatable damages is accepted, where appropriate, through the doctrines of mitigatio or compensation lucri cum damno, whose admissibility (not only in the area of contract law, but also in tort law) and the conditions for their application vary from one Member State’s legal system to another. Indeed, the very harmonization of this part of the legal system was justified, inter alia, by the divergence between national rules on those doctrines, which affected the defendant’s possibilities of avoiding compensation See European Parliament Resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules (2006/2207(INI)), paras. 17, 19. 86 More spec...

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Consultant to Youngsville Television Corporation d/b/a/ Blue Fiber Corp. (000) 000-0000 Attachments: Youngsville Television Corporation d/b/a/ Blue Fiber Corp.Voice Service Agreement Sample Webpage Advertising Voice Service on Blue Fiber Website Sample Webpage Advertising Broadband Service on Blue Fiber Website Sample Blue Fiber Lifeline Marketing

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. Xx. Xxxxxx, 50, has amblyopia in his right eye. His best corrected visual acuities are 20/20 in the left eye and 20/ 400 in the right eye. In a 1999 examination his optometrist said, ‘‘Xx. Xxxxxx has been driving commercial vehicles for many years. It is my opinion that he has sufficient vision to continue performing such driving tasks.’’ Xx. Xxxxxx has been driving straight trucks for 31 years and a total of over 3 million miles and tractor-trailer combination vehicles for 10 years and a total of 500,000 miles. Xx. Xxxxxx holds a Pennsylvania Class AM CDL. His official driving record shows no accident or convictions of moving violations in a CMV in the last 3 years.

Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx. [1899] 1 QB 486. It was the deliberate policy of the legislature that the title of owners who allowed others to remain in possession of their land for many years with their consent but without paying rent or acknowledging their title should eventually be extinguished.